site loader
site loader

Exclusive: Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh opens up on Sushant death case | People News

New Delhi: The loss of life of Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput has raised many eyebrows ever since its investigation started. From Mumbai police main the probe to followers and household demanding a CBI enquiry suspecting foul play – it has been over 100 days and the reality is but to be unveiled.

In an unique dialog with Zee News, Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh talks about Sushant Singh Rajput’s loss of life case. “We additionally wished justice for Sushant and everybody else too however we discovered that faux accounts had been being created on social media to defame and troll Mumbai police. Additionally, these social media campaigns had been on to affect the investigation”, mentioned Singh.

“All of this on the time of pandemic when a number of of my officers succumbed to COVID-19 and 1000’s had been battling it, why all of this was achieved to demoralise the Mumbai police, I can not perceive”, added the highest cop. 

Sushant Singh Rajput was discovered useless at his Bandra residence on June 14, 2020. The case was initially probed by the Mumbai Police however after large public demand, the case went to CBI. 

Quickly, Enforcement Directorate got here into image and probe started within the money-laundering angle involving Sushant’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty, brother Showik and her household.

One other premiere company the Narcotics Management Bureau (NCB) joined the investigation when consumption of medicine was revealed by means of some retrieved WhatsApp chats of Rhea and Sushant’s supervisor Samuel Miranda. 

 

As Rhea Chakraborty stays in custody, Anubhav Sinha and Hansal Mehta express concern | People News

Mumbai: Filmmakers Anubhav Sinha and Hansal Mehta on Tuesday expressed concern for actress Rhea Chakraborty, who continues to be in judicial custody.

A Particular Courtroom within the metropolis earlier within the day prolonged the judicial custody of Rhea and her brother Showik Chakraborty until October 20, in a drug-related case that got here up as a part of the investigation into the demise of Rhea’s boyfriend, late actor Sushant Singh Rajput.

Anubhav Sinha tweeted: “That woman has been in Jail for a month. Severely guys!!!”

Hansal Mehta wrote on the microblogging website: “Please remind me. What’s @Tweet2Rhea in custody for precisely? And why is she nonetheless in custody?”

Reacting to Sinha’s tweet, screenwriter Kanika Dhillon wrote: “Yesss!!! Let that sink in… she has already been in jail for A MONTH!! RELEASE @Tweet2Rhea #rheachakroborty n all those that had been baying for her blood.. replicate. Ponder. And not less than NOW come ahead n assist her to be out of JAIL! #ReleaseRheaChakraborty.”

Reacting to Mehta’s tweet, filmmaker Onir wrote: “Why is @Tweet2Rhea nonetheless in custody ? Is it actually important for the investigation or simply to fulfill a ranting 80k faux account … hate and rant manufacturing unit ?”

On Monday, providing an evidence to netizens enquirng about Rhea, actor Gulshan Devaiah had tweeted from his unverified account: “Let’s take a second right here please. The CBI hasn’t arrested Rhea. It is the NCB as a result of medication ka gochi hai. So it form seems to be foolish to demand her launch on the premise of the AIIMS report as a result of that has nothing to do with why she was arrested together with few others.”

 

 

Payal Ghosh on Richa Chadha’s defamation suit: Why is she trying to defame me? | People News

Mumbai: Actress Richa Chadha has reportedly filed a defamation go well with in opposition to Payal Ghosh and others. Reacting to the event, Payal says she fails to grasp why Richa is making an attempt to defame her.

In keeping with reviews, Richa on Monday filed a case earlier than Bombay Excessive Courtroom for Rs 1.10 crore in opposition to Payal for “tarnishing her fame” and subjecting her to “immense humiliation, ridicule, undesirable hypothesis, harassment, harsh public scrutiny and lack of enterprise alternative and goodwill thereby inflicting great stress and psychological agony”.

Payal, who has accused filmmaker, Anurag Kashyap of sexual harassment, informed IANS: “That is utterly a false accusation. I do not perceive what I’ve to do with this case. Why is she making an attempt to defame me? She ought to as a substitute ask Mr Kashyap why he took her identify.”

“I do not know her personally. We’ll go to courtroom and make clear. I’ve solely mentioned what Mr Kashyap informed me. It’s not me who has taken names,” Payal mentioned.

Final month, Payal had claimed that Kashyap tried to molest her prior to now. She mentioned so as to persuade her, Anurag mentioned that “all of the actresses he has labored with are only a name away” — indicating that these actresses, together with Richa, have offered sexual favours to Kashyap.

In keeping with reviews, nobody appeared on behalf of Payal and others, and the courtroom has requested Richa to serve recent private discover to the respondents together with a service via emails. The courtroom adjourned the case until October 7.

Payal’s advocate Nitin Satpute tweeted on Tuesday: “It is false to say that advocate failed to seem in courtroom as no discover was served that point even on WhatsApp as claimed. Discover served on 5/6/2020 at Payal Ghosh residence, now Will seems in courtroom on seventh Oct.”

Payal mentioned she will not be capable to make it as she shouldn’t be in Mumbai.

 

 

Akshay Kumar’s retro ‘Bellbottom’ teaser storms internet, Twitterati gives a thumbs up! | Movies News

New Delhi: Celebrity Akshay Kumar’s ‘Bellbottom’ teaser was dropped just lately on social media and followers have already given it an enormous thumbs up. Pooja Leisure’s espionage thriller ‘Bellbottom’ teaser has stored the audiences hooked, as suggests the net response of followers. 

The quick 30-second teaser reveals Akshay Kumar striding in direction of a mysterious vacation spot and that too in an uber-stylish pair of bell-bottom pants. 

Akshay is seen in flaunting the retro flare and sure followers are reacting in a constructive means. Check out just a few tweets:

The intriguing background music within the teaser makes provides as much as the edginess of the thriller. Curiously, the teaser is trending on quantity 3 spot on YouTube. 

Pooja Leisure’s ‘Bellbottom’ is directed by Ranjit M Tewari. It options Akshay Kumar within the lead with Vaani Kapoor, Huma Qureshi and Lara Dutta Bhupathi in pivotal elements. 

The movie produced by Vashu Bhagnani, Jackky Bhagnani and Deepshikha Deshmukh, is ready to launch on April 2, 2021. 

 

Simi Garewal Changes Opinion On Kangana Ranaut | Disgusted By Those Who Exploited Sushant’s Death

bredcrumb bredcrumb

News

oi-Srushti Jayadev

|

Simi Garewal, who had earlier prolonged her help to Kangana Ranaut in her struggle for ‘justice’ for late Sushant Singh Rajput, is now saying that she is disgusted by the way in which by which she used his loss of life as a chance for egocentric positive aspects.

Simi Changes Opinion On Kangana; ‘I’m Disgusted’

Simi took to her Twitter deal with to share a information article which mentioned that the Mumbai Police shall be taking motion towards all those that labored to defame them previously few months by creating pretend social media accounts.

Retweeting the article, Simi wrote, “Good transfer @MumbaiPolice. What about exposing those who milked, unfold pretend information & exploited #SSR loss of life for egocentric positive aspects? Motion shud be taken towards them too.”

It lately got here to gentle that over 84,000 pretend accounts had been created to malign Mumbai Police in the middle of their investigation of Sushant’s loss of life, and demoralize them. They are going to be conducting a radical investigation of the matter and punishing violators underneath the Info Expertise Act.

A Twitter person reminded Simi that she had in truth stood by Kangana and referred to as her ‘courageous’ earlier. “I am sorry mam however I keep in mind even you falling prey to the propaganda and believing that SSR was murdered. Plus your fixed appreciation for a bigoted particular person like Kangana who solely milked his loss of life for private vendetta,” she wrote.

Responding to this, Simi wrote, “Sarah at first we had been all shocked & greedy for any clues & information. However when the abject motives emerged & continued advert nauseam, I am disgusted!! They have been feasting on Sushant’s loss of life!!”

In help of Kangana, Simi had earlier tweeted, “I applaud #KanganaRanaut who’s braver & bolder than I’m. Solely I understand how a ‘highly effective’ individual has viciously tried to destroy my profession. I stayed silent. As a result of I’m not so courageous… @KanganaOffical.”

“I do not know what all of you felt after watching #KanganaSpeaksToArnab ..nevertheless it has left me fairly depressed.. I am distraught at what #SushantSingRajput endured .. and in addition what many ‘outsiders’ undergo in Bollywood.. it should change,” she had written in one other tweet.

ALSO READ: Kangana Ranaut As soon as Mentioned She Was A Drug Addict, Now Says She’ll Depart Mumbai If Drug Hyperlinks Are Discovered

ALSO READ: Renuka Shahane On Kangana Ranaut: If You Are A Vile Particular person, Your Tweet Will Replicate That

Samantha Akkineni posts wedding anniversary wish for hubby Naga Chaitanya | Regional News

Mumbai: Telugu star couple Samantha Akkineni and Naga Chaitanya have accomplished three years of marriage. On Tuesday, Samantha took to Instagram to want her husband on their anniversary.

“You might be my individual and I’m yours, that no matter door we come to, we’ll open it collectively. Completely happy anniversary husband @chayakkineni,” she wrote.

Alongside together with her be aware, she posted a good looking image of the couple wearing conventional outfits.

Reacting to the put up, actress Kriti Kharbanda commented: “Completely happy anniversary you two.”

Samantha and Chaitanya met on the set of Gautham Menon’s “Ye Maaya Chesave” in 2010 and dated for some time. The couple tied the knot in Goa.

 

Rangoli Chandel Hits Back At Shabana Azmi | Why Don’t You Just Stick To Acting

bredcrumb bredcrumb

News

oi-Srushti Jayadev

|

In a current interview, veteran actor Shabana Azmi provided her tackle Kangana Ranaut’s fixed assaults on the Hindi movie business and her colleagues. Shabana mentioned that Kangana’s assumed self-importance and her making outrageous statements is a results of her wanting to stay within the headlines. She additionally mentioned that Kangana ought to persist with appearing.

Now, Kangana’s sister Rangoli Chandel has hit again at Shabana. Rangoli took to her Instagram deal with to query Shabana. She requested why Shabana and her husband do not persist with their respective professions of appearing and poetry.

Rangoli Hits Back At Shabana: Why Don’t You Stick To Acting?

Whereas speaking to Mumbai Mirror concerning the present unrest in Bollywood, Shabana additionally shared what she felt about Kangana’s controversies. “Kangana has began believing in her personal fantasy. She says she taught feminism to the movie business, she taught it nationalism I am glad she spelled that out as a result of no one else had seen! I feel she fears the day when she’s going to not be within the headlines and so has to maintain making outrageous statements to remain within the information. Poor lady, why does not she simply do what she is greatest at, which is appearing,” she mentioned.

In response to this, Rangoli wrote in an Instagram story, “Right here comes the suicide gang! Expensive Shabana ji I’ve a number of questions for you and your husband. Why do not you each additionally persist with your respective appearing and poetry? Why do you guys actively take part in anti India politics? To stay in headlines? Otherwise you really feel for sure points? For those who anti India agendas are real then why cannot her professional India agendas be real as effectively? Why completely different guidelines for her and completely different for you?”

Kangana has been slammed by lots of celebrities within the current previous for apparently being opportunistic and bullying her colleagues.

ALSO READ: Kangana Ranaut Makes Outrageous Statements To Keep In The News, Says Shabana Azmi

Suniel Shetty Says It Upsets Him When His Children Get Dragged Into Nepotism Debate

bredcrumb bredcrumb

News

oi-Srushti Jayadev

|

Suniel Shetty, whose daughter Athiya Shetty and son Ahan Shetty are following his footsteps and exploring performing, opened up in regards to the debate on nepotism of their context. Suniel shared that listening to about his children names dragged into the nepotism debate would not irritate or anger him, however it upsets him. He needs his children get acknowledged for their very own exhausting work and expertise.

Suniel Gets Candid About Nepotism And His Children

Chatting with Hindustan Occasions, Suniel mentioned, “I by no means get irritated or indignant, it upsets me. It hurts me, greater than the rest. It’s Athiya’s future and exhausting work, which she’s going to show. Motichoor Chaknachoor wasn’t a giant movie, and had lots of issues due to the producer. Someplace down the road, she obtained appreciated tremendously, and that is precisely what it’s. She selected the topic that she wished to do. Each youngster on this world has the suitable to observe their dream.”

For individuals who do not know, Motichoor Chaknachoor was a 2019 movie which starred Athiya and Nawazuddin Siddiqui. Though the movie did poorly on the field workplace, the actors had been praised for his or her performances in it.

Suniel continued to say, “Do not push your kids for training, or obtain this a lot. Educating them is our accountability as dad and mom, however allow them to select their future. What has this Covid 19 pandemic proved? It’s worthwhile to be blissful, and internally robust. On one facet, I’m attempting to offer so many different children a chance by way of my initiative.”

“That approach, I’ve 2,72,000 and two kids. For me, all are equal. For me, greater than alternative, it was this bloody exploitation of expertise that used to occur, financially, mentally, bodily, casting sofa, so I wished that you probably have expertise, you’ll get work,” he mentioned, speaking about his initiative targeted on serving to folks discover jobs.

ALSO READ: Shikha Talsania On Nepotism: Folks Did not Know I Was Tiku Talsania’s Daughter

Mahabharat’s Gajendra Chauhan blasts Mukesh Khanna for his ‘vulgar’ comment on Kapil Sharma’s show | Television News

New Delhi: Social media is heated up after ‘Shaktiman’ actor Mukesh Khanna, who performed Bhishma Pitamah in epic tv sequence ‘Mahabharat’ referred to as out The Kapil Sharma Present in his new submit on Instagram and even mentioned it’s ‘vulgar’. He expressed his displeasure on the cross-dressing the place males are dressed-up as ladies on the present to play varied characters.

This is his submit: 

For the uninitiated, the solid of ‘Mahabharat’ was referred to as to Kapil Sharma’s present not too long ago in one of many particular episodes by which Mukesh Khanna was not current. 

Gajendra Chauhan, who went on the present together with different lead members blasted Mukesh Khanna for calling out Kapil in such a derogatory method. In an interview with Hindustan Occasions.com, Gajendra aka Dharamraj Yudhishthir bashed Mukesh by saying that if he had points with males dressing up as ladies on Kapil’s present, then why did he not depart ‘Mahabharat’ the place Arjun was additionally dressed as a lady in one of many scenes?

Additional, Gajendra reacted to Mukesh’s new video on Instagram the place he’s seen taking a dig at him. “Should you see the video, he has himself mentioned that he was not invited and that he wouldn’t go on the present even when he was invited. That is like ‘maan na maan important tera mehmaan’. When he was not invited within the first place, how would he even go? Secondly, I believe he has began considering of himself as an authority on Mahabharat. He goes round giving gyaan to everybody. Within the course of, he has misplaced his personal data,”  he informed Hindustan Occasions. 

Including additional, Gajendra mentioned: He desires to touch upon some common folks and convey himself within the limelight. First, he commented on Ekta Kapoor and her Mahabharat, criticising it and saying that it was badly made. Anyone has the correct to make Mahabharat in their very own method. Nobody has registered Mahabharat in his title. Then, he attacked Sonakshi Sinha, and now he has attacked Kapil Sharma. I believe that is an try and convey himself within the limelight by attacking distinguished folks.

“I additionally wish to say, movies aren’t vulgar. Movies are both good or dangerous, hit or flop. He was a flop actor earlier than Mahabharat. All his movies had failed, which is why he turned to TV from movies. He was first solid as Dronacharya. Vijayendra Ghatge was purported to play Bhishma Pitamah, however he was busy with Buniyad, so he needed to let go of the function,” he added.

Gajendra added, “I object to his feedback. Yesterday, he posted a video on his YouTube channel. I fully condemn it. He ought to have a look at himself. Those that dwell in glass homes shouldn’t throw stones at others. Please have a look at your individual profession and movies. You had been tagged as a flop actor earlier than Mahabharat. It was Mahabharat which saved your profession. I used to be only a newcomer. I did two movies earlier than doing the present.”

Mukesh Khanna performed Bhishma Pitamah within the 90s epic present ‘Mahabharat’. His co-stars Nitish Bharadwaj, Puneet Issar, Pradeep Kumar, Gajendra Chauhan, Gufi Paintal and Arjun Firoz Khan had appeared on ‘The Kapil Sharma present’.

 

‘Varmaa’ movie review: Bala’s version is shorter and an insipid remake

The filmmaker appears to be completely indifferent and uninterested — both with the topic materials or the actors — leading to a multitude that’s already tousled

When the announcement got here that Bala was going to remake that movie, it was celebrated by a bit of movie buffs who could or could not have appreciated the Telugu authentic, however have been remotely due to the identify connected to it and the interpretation the filmmaker — historically identified for coping with violent characters — would give to a film which might nicely be seen as a religious sister to his personal Sethu. Pardon the cynicism, however I half-expected Bala to present a redemptive arc to this morally-wretched universe, and suspected it to be much more violent — within the method through which it treats the heroine and everybody besides the titular character — and subsequently extra “problematic”.

Additionally Learn: Get ‘First Day First Present’, our weekly e-newsletter from the world of cinema, in your inbox. You may subscribe totally free right here

However the Bala Minimize, as it might come to be identified, is surprisingly chilly and lifeless — even by the requirements set by Adithya Varma — and edits out the dramatic bits of the Telugu authentic, solely limiting to its plot factors. The filmmaker appears to be completely indifferent and uninterested — both with the topic materials or the actors — right here and offers a reinterpretation to his personal Sethu, with regard to the way in which the heroine is written and coached to carry out. Megha Vasudevan (Megha Chowdhury) is essentially the most submissive of all variations put collectively; she comes from an higher caste household from Kerala, wears conventional garments and flowers in her hair, within the introduction scene, and is God-fearing (sings ‘Harivarasanam’ earlier than switching to ‘Jimikki Kammal’). In brief, she is the Abitha Kujalambal (from Sethu) that the authentic didn’t outline within the first place. She, like Abitha of that movie, is possessed and harassed by the hero.

In my evaluation of Adithya Varma, I had written: “What has additionally remained a thriller is the redeeming high quality of Preeti/Meera in direction of the climax stretch. What’s so nice or pure about Adithya Varma that any girl would put up with?” Varmaa, too, doesn’t appear to broach that prepare of thought. In that sense, Adithya Varma works a lot better as a movie than this — whether or not it’s performances or music.

Simply asking

  • Varmaa launched legally on three platforms in India: The Ally, Shreyas Media and Shemaroo Leisure, and the viewers can watch it by way of pay-per-view. It’s priced at ₹140. I logged onto The Ally by way of my laptop computer. Every little thing went clean till I acquired a message on the touchdown web page which stated: “Anti Seize Service software not put in.”
  • From what I perceive, it’s an extension on Google Chrome which protects the display screen from being recorded, and which I did set up — this was after the cost gateway was profitable. The web site requested, or moderately, pressured me to obtain and set up a 3rd occasion software (AntiCaptureService) — which is freed from value — with the intention to entry Varmaa. I used to be sceptical and fuming as a result of a) it’s a third occasion app, so there is no such thing as a assure to your knowledge being protected and b) I completely had zero curiosity. After putting in the stated app, I attempted to refresh the web page to a message that learn: “Anti Seize Service detected seize program Radeonsettings.” The final time I checked, Radeon.exe was a driver for the graphic card.
  • If you’re so involved about your film touchdown on a pirated web site — which it did hours earlier than its precise launch — then why launch in any respect on a streaming platform? Why would you arm twist the viewers to put in a 3rd occasion app onto their programs for a film which you, as a producer, scrapped it within the first place and later determined to monetise from it? I ultimately watched the movie on The Ally’s cell software.

One of many issues that turned a topic of debate when that movie launched was how that man fats shames his girlfriend’s mates, making crude jokes about them. That complete portion is eliminated in Varmaa, but it surely does have its justifiable share of sexist dialogues. In a single scene, we see that man calling out somebody for “objectifying ladies” and in the identical breath, makes use of a derogatory phrase (in Tamil for ladies) to check with that individual, countering himself.

However what Bala tries and will get it marginally proper, not like different filmmakers, is the extra house and weight given to the home helper Bhavani (performed by Easwari Rao). This seemingly insignificant character is there in all variations, however is made right into a joke due to that man. However Bala humanises her, making her the ethical epicentre of this movie — to not the impact he would have appreciated, but it surely nonetheless is an attention-grabbing addition.

That man is entitled and a spoilt brat due to the privileges he enjoys from his household and his rapid circle, who merely exist and whose existence would elevate concern outdoors of the movie’s universe. Bhavani is the one and the one one who stands her floor and who can be answerable for the individual that man turned out to be. She is the mom he by no means had, maybe explaining his man-child points. In reality, when she says it was she who raised him, he turns pale slapping her with: “Didn’t you receives a commission?” He’s that type of a man.

The one frequent denominator in all of the retellings of that movie is the opening card which begins with: “No birds, animals have been harmed in the course of the making.” It ought to ideally learn as: “No birds, animals have been harmed — solely people, significantly ladies, and movie journalists.”